US Royal Watcher
Royal Highness
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,976
- City
- Washington
- Country
- United States
All that shows me is Camilla's PA took the fall for Bolland. It makes no difference to the Sun who leaked the story. Why would the royal correspondent for the Sun say it was Bolland when in fact it was Camilla's aide?
Why would Amanda MacManus take the fall for Bolland? But there is still no answer for the larger question is why Bolland would leak the story at all. The backfire was foreseeable. Throughout the War of the Royals, leaks were almost always followed up by investigations into the identity and the motives of the leakers.
Regarding the Sun's motive, I suppose it is possible that Bolland confirmed the story after it was obvious the Sun already had it. It's also possible that the Sun manufactured the Bolland leak as a way to discredit Charles and Bolland.