Recent content by Duchess

i can't find the photo but i'm sure it was in the DM about 3 or 4 weeks ago. it's not the photo shop one...you're right though - it's awful! i saw that one and had to do a double take but no, it's not that one. i wish i'd asked this when i first saw it. if i remember correctly, you couldn't...

i recently saw a picture of the Duchess of Cornwall curtseying to the Duchess of Cambridge. i thought it would be the other way around?

i'm with you on this trishy. if it was a public event i.e. a royal walk about or a celebrity taking part in a promotional event then that's different but if saw the same people in a restaurant or out shopping or in the airport i wouldn't take a pic. william does have a job so there's no fallacy...

i remember reading an article saying that as well. i also recently read that the reason for the split was that he was finding it hard to deal with all the media attention.

couple of interesting things to point out about the above artice: interesting that the CP Mary is wearing trousers...don't see that often, if at all, on official appearances. and, sadly, William has resorted to the "gulp" dreaded combover!

Duchess of Cambridge's refusal to eat peanut paste sparks rumours she is expecting | Mail Online would be lovely if it's true.

i absolutely, postively knew that doing this program on oprah's network, or any network, was a bad idea. as soon as i heard them mention it, it screamed of oprah taking advantage of a situation. the best thing for sarah is to remove herself from the spotlight and get her life back on track...

how wonderful that catherine and the girl had their picture taken together. would any other royal have let that happen? :flowers:

not sure if i'm misundertanding you here but divorce doesn't exist in the catholic church. the marriage must be annulled by the church (civilannullements don't count in the church either) :flowers:

apology accepted...no hard feelings :)

i'm not trying to start an argument here but i've just done some looking and every page i've found has said it was a honeymoon and the official page makes no mention of a honeymoon at all so i'm wondering where the information about the SA trip not being a honeymoon came from?

no, we don't know that it's true but we also don't know that it's untrue. a practical arrangement? on their honeymoon? if the trip were for any other reason other than their honeymoon then this statement MIGHT make sense but no...not on their honeymoon. I'm not in the perfection game BUT...

when was the last time you did? call me crazy but when does a woman, happily anticipating her wedding purchase a one way ticket back home days before her wedding and try to leave the county only to have her passport confiscated? when does a happy bride sleep in a hotel 10 miles down the road...

i have no problem with this either - it's quite realistic really - however this woman is extremely unhappy so something is wrong.

same here...maybe they've removed it now.