Search results

My father was a military. It was always for the time being. Yet a very stable home.

I think it’s about everyone’s own definition. Showing one’s back, in my opinion, it’s an evening thing, and in any way not for a church service. To have the bride do it I consider vulgar. It’s not like she couldn’t afford a second dress for the party. Again, it’s just my personal opinion. No...

[.....]And that’s RAVEC’s business to assess. It’s one thing to say that I’ve seen people affirming their dislike, it’s completely different to have the competence to discern what is threatening and what is just lip work. As for agressiveness, there are lunatics in both camps. I have a huge...

If that’s the worst, a little idiot posting online, and who was already jailed, then I understand better why RAVEC is working on a case by case basis. Harry himself made some allegations that were from the category “truth may vary”. So I’m not going to take his demand at face value.

and that’s why RAVEC found that bespoke solution, assessing every visit individually. Threats might be temporary or resolved. As for his visa, at the moment that they’ve moved to US (spring 2020), they were in the one year to review, so it’s only logic that he had that type of visa. It would be...

Prince Harry got permission to appeal the ruling in his suit regarding his security. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7228zd319lo.amp

Without doubt. As an American citizen I believe she didn’t need a tourist visa when it all began. As long as she left UK every three months she should have been good. And then she got engaged.

Let’s cool down before the thread is closed again. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and they can use what arguments they see fit to sustain said opinion.

DM has the nasty habit of publishing anodine facts in an unflattering light. But most of the time they are using real facts. And the other tabloids too. There are so many examples in the past.

They do have a communication something for UK and Europe, don’t they? Charlie what’s-his-name. The one who gave that statement that The King is too busy to see Harry when he came for St. Paul Thanksgiving service? LE Found it, Charlie Gibson. https://archive.ph/JUpFW

Neither does People about Lili’s birthday party. The press writes about them. Readers are interested enough to click on the articles. Revenue is generated. Nothing to do with the true truth. Parts of the press cater to their fans, other parts cater to those who dislike them.

I agree, I think most of this is pragmatic. I think that maybe Andrew wants to leave the lease to one of his daughters, and a new lease will not be as advantageous as the current one. As I understand, even if there are conditions in the lease to maintain the lodge, not fulfilling those...

Here’s the article from The Times https://archive.ph/RGJNM

He has a lease, signed in 2003, I think, for a long period, something like 75 years, I don’t remember exactly. It is the property of the Crown Estate, not private property.

It would be relevant to know what kind of visa was granted to Princess Madeleine. Almost similar status.

Very interesting development and implications in the visa application suit. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13460069/american-government-documents-prince-harry-secret-fears-stigma-published.html# And this is a comment to that article: “I think the public has a right to know if he's...

I started watching Suits when Meghan came on the royal watching scene. I got bored pretty quickly, before the end of the first season, same same like so many mediocre series. The ones who impressed me (characters, I mean) were the ones of Gina Torres and Rick Hoffman. If not for them, it could...

The thing is that a legal suit has procedures that must be observed. Maybe it’s not always obvious but it’s not a school yard to report to the teacher all the meanies.

Exactly. The sorrow is that, in the RF setting, there are people charged with preventing such mishaps. Remember how a team goes at the destination and checks the whole itinerary a few months/weeks before the tour? The Sussexes must be aware of this step of the planning of a tour but I suppose...

What matters to people is not for anybody to say. It is up to the person to appreciate what matters. On the other hand, all that the Sussexes want is to NOT fall into obscurity. Remember how Harry said he only has a few years to be relevant before George becomes the star? (Something along those...

I can’t believe there has been “God Save the King” played and everyone stood to attention. In what capacity was it played? They do not represent, they stated it clear that THEY DON’T WANT TO REPRESENT THE UK.

https://archive.is/9McBg

The visit is at the invitation of the Nigerian Defence Headquarters for the Invictus founder. Not archewell, not women empowerement, not betterup. Invictus. I rather it was clear for everyone involved. When the program was published it was such a mess that the High Comissioner had to issue a...

Wasn’t it a visit on behalf of Invictus? I don’t see how it’s acceptable to center it around their agenda. If not on behalf of Invictus, what are two private individuals playing at being official representatives? Who or what do they represent?

But they didn’t, did they? They DID say that Harry was not meeting his father because of his father but not anything to quash all the thunder of this quasi royal tour.