Oh thanks, I hadn't seen Princess Antoinette's family there. Has it been said where will tonight's party take place?
Here's a little video, the caption states that Pierre was there as well, someone has a pic of him?
Video
Prince Albert said in an interview that some family members will be missing because they have to prepare the after party, still strange to me.
I've found this comment in this article:
Alberts einsamer Geburtstag: Wo war Charlene Wittstock? - Bild.de
Who is the little blonde boy in the cake-cutting pictures?
And does anyone know if CW was at the private party later on?
I guess he smartened up and did not let his once-in-a-lifetime 50th birthday party become the Charlene Wittstock show? !
R.
The little boy is the youngest Monégasque, who was born on March 14. He celebratedWho is the little blonde boy in the cake-cutting pictures?
And does anyone know if CW was at the private party later on?
I guess he smartened up and did not let his once-in-a-lifetime 50th birthday party become the Charlene Wittstock show? !
R.
Probably, can't have one without the other . Some new spieces of Siamese twins has evolved here. JMO!And does anyone know if CW was at the private party later on?
I'm not so sure about that, practically all the reports I read mentioned her or lamented her absence. Basically all the tributes, photo galleries and the one "documentary" I saw managed to mention Charlene and wedding rumours. Some of them rather substantially. The local paper interviewed three invitees to Albert's party yesterday and two of them managed to mention wedding announcements. (I assume the interviews were held before Albert's little speech.) So the palace's denial didn't even reach Albert's own subjects, let alone the rest of the world. IMO, and IMO only probably, Albert's 50th has well and truly been eclipsed by Charlene. Even if she wasn't present.I guess he smartened up and did not let his once-in-a-lifetime 50th birthday party become the Charlene Wittstock show? !
R.
Probably, can't have one without the other . Some new spieces of Siamese twins has evolved here. JMO!
I'm not so sure about that, practically all the reports I read mentioned her or lamented her absence. Basically all the tributes, photo galleries and the one "documentary" I saw managed to mention Charlene and wedding rumours. Some of them rather substantially. The local paper interviewed three invitees to Albert's party yesterday and two of them managed to mention wedding announcements. (I assume the interviews were held before Albert's little speech.) So the palace's denial didn't even reach Albert's own subjects, let alone the rest of the world. IMO, and IMO only probably, Albert's 50th has well and truly been eclipsed by Charlene. Even if she wasn't present.
It seems to me that the media, once they knew a big announcement wasn't to be expected, lost interest in the celebrations
If the ONLY way to be celebrated or to have anything celebrated is to LEAVE CHARLENE OUT, then what type of life are they looking for ?
When he finally a part of a couple where people look forward to SEEING THEM TOGETHER and celebrating their life together .. he would be more likely to marry.
I recall Prince Charles being completely usurped by everyone's fascination with his fiancee/wife. It eroded his self-esteem after a while and could not have helped their union.
R.
CW's mom said in her interview a few days ago that CW was too busy arranging plans for the Prince's 50th private birthday party. I think so if you are planning someone's landmark birthday party you would be in his life pretty deeply. Mind you, anyone I date for over two years would have met my parents by now, even if I had to take some of my 40,000Eu princely-girlfriend -allowance a month and fly them in myself. Is she afraid that they might cause controversy or embarrass her in some way? And he has been to SA .. so why could he not see them then? What type of lack of chivalry is going on here? Even as a boyfriend .. forget about marriage ... would you NOT meet a girl's family by now?
R.
No ONLINE pictures in "Hola"?
I am sorry it isn't a new photo, no in the same it's a photo after birthday, this photo is taken during holidays with Caroline, look the lamps, the pull over of Caroline, Charlene or Albert, plus look the shirt of Albert. the photo is only taken under another angle that those which one sawit is in the new issues hola magazine for these week cover, look down the magazine you will see the picture, again you have to buy it to see the new photo.
I am sorry it isn't a new photo, no in the same it's a photo after birthday, this photo is taken during holidays with Caroline, look the lamps, the pull over of Caroline, Charlene or Albert, plus look the shirt of Albert. the photo is only taken under another angle that those which one saw
furst holidays
compare to this photo from Hola
There's a thread with them. I bumped the thread up.Wow you have a great eye for detail and you are correct. That is where that photo was taken. So there are at present no photos of the private party.
Also as to the photos of the "castle", I do not think that is Albert's estate from the photos I have seen of it. It doesn't appear to be it at all. The estate was more of a chateau as opposed to a castle. It would be great is some of our photo wizards on this forum could post pictures of the estate if they have them so we could get a better idea.