I do not believe that this was an act of vandalism. This has been intentional, and even, I would say that they have broken it the same morning, after the wedding announcement was known, in order to divert the attention of the foreign media.
why for me it is not a vandalism:
- Whenever there have been vandal acts, they have not broken a specific element, they have destroyed everything they have found, never against an object.
- They have not painted the tombstone, with the hammer and sickle, perhaps because it had to be done quickly, they did not have time to stay to paint it.
- They have chosen from the tombs curiously the one that is more difficult to locate.
- They have brought tools to do it, because that cross can only be broken with a good hammer.
- They have gone directly against the cross, the rest has been irrelevant to them.
- They have gone directly against the cross, the rest has been irrelevant to them.The cross is the most striking thing in the tomb.When the tombstone and the cross have been painted red, nobody has given importance to it, but the cross, yes is relevant, they , who have attacked the tomb, do it at the moment when there is an important announcement of the royal family.
For me, this is not the way of proceeding of those who habitually carry out these vandal acts, they always attack, not a tomb in the cemetery, all the tombs in the cemetery, I do not see any headstone painted red, it is clean. Whoever attacked the tombs of King Paul and Queen Frederika, in my opinion, had a straightforward objective, and they knew what they were looking for divert attention, they seek their moment of prominence
*
For me, this is not the way of proceeding of those who habitually carry out these vandal acts,
I do not think they was the communists or anarchists group.