Since you have quoted the entirety of my post which addressed several different points, it is difficult to see what you are referring to.
If you meant the belief that a hypothetical female heiress would transfer the principality to her husband's family and/or change the family name, then those were not among Hereditary Prince Alois's cited justifications for his belief in men-only rule, at least in that particular interview.
For those just joining this discussion, SirGyamfi1 is discussing the following interview with Hereditary Prince Alois, where the prince confirmed he wants only males to rule Liechtenstein. The reasons he cited were that according to him, this maintains "stability" and avoids having too many members of the princely family.
Liechtensteins Erbprinz gegen Frau an Spitze - Vaterland online
I don't believe anyone said you said anyone would renounce anything.
Last year I already answered your claim that Alois's support for sexist succession laws is motivated by tradition, and you in turn answered my answer, so instead of repeating the exchange, I will simply link back to that earlier post.
https://www.theroyalforums.com/foru...events-3-may-2007-a-12603-18.html#post2480450