I have no idea if any of this article is accurate, but I find it interesting that the part regarding the couple requesting a ' lift ' home is debunked but the British government / palace involvement regarding The First Lady attending the IG appears to be regarded as correct. I am wondering why one section is claimed to be nonsense but the other part could be true. From what I see it is all the one article. I can see no evidence that one is accurate and the other is not. One could argue that if they had obtained the lift in Airforce 1 then they would have not attended the internment.
I am pretty sure Dr, Biden is more than capable of making her own decisions and does not require input from the British government / palace
Lets be honest none of us have an idea.
I mean the article clearly states that the Telegraph has independently confirmed that the IG story was true, whereas no one from either the WH or the Sussex camp was willing to go on the record for the story about them requesting a ride on Air Force One. Hence why there is more ambiguity about one story versus the other.
"As such, Jill Biden was invited to attend the 2022 Invictus Games in The Hague but that too was declined, The Telegraph has confirmed. British officials are understood to have conveyed to National Security Council staff in a “working level conversation” that they thought the idea would land badly with the palace."
No one suggested the First Lady is incapable of making her own decisions, which is why I said it was a bad look on her part as well.